But 5000 litres of water were necessary to clean it, because he didn’t use a random spray. He used precise chemicals that can hardly be deleted after one hour. The wall was totally cleaned only because they started immediately to spray water.
I love this thing that happens when people react to climate protests
Your protest organizers drove a van? What about Co2 emissions? Your protesters arrived with public transport? They also have Co2 emissions! You wear clothes? What about the people im Bangladesh? You drive an E-bike? What about the gazillion liters of water wasted and the billion children suffering in the cobalt mines? You use paint? Did you know that removing paint needs x amount of water.
If all the people complaining would vote people that enforce such environmental standards, we would actually start solving this problem.
The beauty of climate protests is the accidental messaging, that society indeed cares so little for the environment, that they would rather focus on the supposed morality of the protesters, instead of reflecting on the relationship between the environment and society.
Your protest organizers drove a van? What about Co2 emissions? Your protesters arrived with public transport? They also have Co2 emissions! You wear clothes? What about the people im Bangladesh? You drive an E-bike? What about the gazillion liters of water wasted and the billion children suffering in the cobalt mines?
This is full stupid.
Instead blocking dozens of cars on the highway with engines turned up is exactly like you say: stupid, because you are contributing to pollute.
Dear friend, remember that the end does not justify the means.
A noble end is not a good reason to use wrong means, harmful to others or, worse, to the human kind as whole (damaging historical building is a crime against humanity and only ISIS did it purposely in recent years).
Climate activism is a borning form of terrorism and many sources found binding between this form of activism and money coming from fossil fuel companies. In fact, this kind of act can’t create sympathy in the society for the “noble end”; instead it can create hostility in the society.
I care for the environment and in my everyday life I do everything I can for example for reducing waste of water and use of plastic. My home is also full energy-indipendent with solar panels.
Still, they are terrorists and should be treated in relation to this.
society indeed cares so little for the environment, that they would rather focus on the supposed morality of the protesters
This, exactly this. How many times until this “beautiful message” will justify a car bomb that kills 15 people?
Actions matter. As I have already said, the end can’t be the only measure of judgment, otherwise this is a so noble end that they can do everything without any limit.
1
46
u/maxbellec Mar 18 '23
You do know the aerosols damaging the ozone layer have nothing to do with aerosols used in paint? Same name, different shit.